Crowing
rooster cocky after couple lose court case
from: www.smh.com.au -
December 19, 2003
A rooster whose pre-dawn
cock-a-doodle-doo upset a neighbouring couple will be able to continue
his crowing after a French judge today threw out a court case hanging over
him.
The judge, in the eastern
town of Gap, upheld a lower court's verdict that the fowl -- a living representative
of France's national symbol -- was just doing what he was meant to do and
the couple had no right to demand he be removed.
They were ordered to pay
legal costs.
The two plaintiffs, who
in 1999 moved into a rural house right next to a chicken farm that had
been there for more than a decade, had complained that the rooster had
given them insomnia with its crowing at 4am.
The rooster's owner, Eric
Villiot, told AFP that the judgment was a victory for animal-breeders across
the country who had problems with neighbours -- a phenomenon that has increased
with the trend of city-dwellers buying second homes in France's countryside.
As for his loudmouthed bird, he said:
"I am going to let my rooster die a natural death."
news
link
[Thanks
to user 'Chevalo' for this story]
Cockerels
dole out more sperm to new lovers
18:00 05 November 03 -
NewScientist.com news service
Copulating cockerels show
"unprecedented sophistication" in the way they dole out their sperm, suggests
a new study. The findings by Swedish and British researchers challenge
the view that males use a straightforward reproduction strategy to simply
mate with as many females as possible.
Male fowl devote considerably
more sperm to their first encounter with a new mate than with a familiar
one, the study reveals. They will also increase the sperm delivered if
rival males are around. And an attractive hen - with a large comb adorning
her head - will receive more sperm than a less attractive female.
"We tested the idea that male fowl allocate sperm differently according
to the quality of copulation," says Tommaso Pizzari, an evolutionary biologist
now at the University of Leeds, who led the study.
In promiscuous species -
and most are - males not only compete with each other for mates, but sperm
from different males may compete after copulation to fertilise the eggs
of a single female. "The male that inseminates more sperm into the
female is more likely to achieve fertilisation," Pizzari told New Scientist.
"Like a lottery, the more tickets a male buys, the more likely he is to
win fertilisation." Simple ideas about male reproductive strategies are
not adequate, he says: "Their reproductive behaviour is extremely sophisticated
and quite complex."
"It shows males are very
sophisticated in the way they spend their precious sperm," agrees Matthew
Gage, at the University of East Anglia. "We are getting more and more information
that sperm are not as cost-free as previously supposed." He notes that
human sperm take 72 days to make. And other studies have shown that inactive
adders actually lose weight over time due to the metabolic cost of sperm
production.
Pizzari and his colleagues
examined how feral male fowl (Gallus gallus) allocated their sperm in different
scenarios after two days of sexual abstinence. Females were fitted with
a special harness to collect the fresh ejaculate.
In the presence of other
males, the copulating male upped the quota of sperm. But this response
is "very strongly status specific" says Pizzari.
Dominant males keep increasing
their sperm, however many other males come along. Less dominant cockerels
increased their ejaculate if there was one more male on the scene, but
if any more were present they would "bow out and conserve their sperm"
notes Gage.
A new partner also piqued
sexual interest and the amount of sperm from the males. With one female,
the male becomes progressively less interested and his ejaculate volume
goes down almost exponentially with each consecutive mating, says Pizzari.
After about 20 copulations,
the team assumed the male's "half-hearted" mountings were because it had
run out of sperm. But when presented with a completely new female, their
sexual interest "miraculously resuscitated", he says.And contrary to conventional
views, the female's sexual adornments did matter. Females with bigger combs
tend to be reproductively superior to other hens, producing more eggs with
more yolk. Males preferentially choose to mate with these hens when given
the choice, but they confirmed this preference by also investing more sperm.Journal
reference: Nature (vol 426, p 70)
Shaoni Bhattacharya
[Thanks
to user 'Chevalo' for this story]
|